•  Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails [99KB]
  (Cutcliffe J.R. & McKenna H.P. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(2), 126–135)
•  The good, the bad and the relative, part two: Goodness and the criterion problem in qualitative research [78KB]
  (Emden C., Sandelowski M. (1999)International Journal of Nursing Practice 5, 2–7)
•  Reconceptualising rigour: the case for reflexivity [90KB]
  (Koch T. & Harrington A. (1998) Journal of Advanced Nursing 28(4), 882–890)
•  Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails [99KB]
  (Cutcliffe J.R. & McKENNA H.P. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(2), 126–135)
•  Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis [77KB]
  (Penrod J . & Hupcey J.E. (2005) Journal of Advanced Nursing 50(4), 403–409)
•  Enhancing the quality of hermeneutic research: decision trail [80KB]
  (Whitehead L. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(5), 512–518)

•  Rigour and grounded theory research [87KB]
  (Chiovitti R.F. & Piran N. (2003) Journal of Advanced Nursing 44(4), 427–435)
•  Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research [87KB]
  (Hope K.W. & Waterman H.A. (2003) Journal of Advanced Nursing 44(2), 120–127)
•  Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity [90KB]
  (Koch T. & Harringron A. (1998) Journal of Advanced Nursing 28(4), 882–890)
•  Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework [87KB]
  (Tobin G.A. & Begley C.M. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(4), 388–396)
•  Validity in action research: a discussion on theoretical and practice issues encountered whilst using observation to collect data [72KB]
  (Turnock C. & Gibson V. (2001) Journal of Advanced Nursing 36(3), 471–477)
•  Story telling: is it really research? [94KB]
  (Koch T. (1998) Journal of Advanced Nursing 28(6), 1182–1190)

•  Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens [75KB]
  (Cutcliffe J.R. & McKenna H.P. (1999) Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(2), 374–380)
•  Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences [92KB]
  (Eakin J.M. & Mykhalovskiy E. (2002) Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9(2), 187–194)
•  Understanding and evaluating qualitative research [168KB]
  (Fossey E., Harvey C., McDermott F. & Davidson L. (2002) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36, 717–732)
•  Evaluation of qualitative research [60KB]
  (Horsburgh D. (2003) Journal of Clinical Nursing 12, 307–312)
•  Arguments for `British Pluralism' in qualitative health research [81KB]
  (Johnson M., Long T. & White A. (2001) Journal of Advanced Nursing 33(2), 243–249)
•  A New Foundation for Methodological Triangulation [79KB]
  (Risjord M.W., Dunbar S.B. & Moloney M.F. (2002) Journal of Nursing Scholarship 34(3), 269–275)
•  The Point of Triangulation [135KB]
  (Thurmond V.A. (2001) Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33(3), 253-258)
•  Developing a conceptual understanding of rural health practice [77KB]
  (Bourke L., Sheridan C., Russell U., Jones G., DeWitt D. & Liaw S. (2004) Aust. J. Rural Health 12, 181–186)

Student Study Skill Development

• Skills to Advance Your Research
  University of Technology Sydney (great resource with many useful tools and ideas)

Database Searching

• Effective Database Searching
  The University of Auckland
• Skills for effective database searching
  University of Canterbury

Designing a Search Strategy for Literature

•  The Literature Review Process: Recommendations for Researchers [67KB]
   NHS Oxfordradcliffe

Library Workshop Program

• Tours and Workshops
  University of Tasmania (note the times are to be confirmed)

Literature Review

• The Literature Review
  Central Queensland University
• Literature Review
  Brock University

Effective Academic Writing

• Writing for Publication Seminar
  Australian Journal of Rural Health (7 March 2007)
• Writing Program
  Dartmouth College (excellent basic information about writing)
• The Argument
  University of North Carolina